Tweets

Gallery

Expand all | Collapse all


Chris’s Daily Photo

Subscribe to:

FourFax Stats

  • Total Stats
    • 346 Posts
    • 172 Comments
    • 49 Comment Posters
    • 28 Links
    • 7 Post Categories
    • 4 Link Categories

Archives

Defence review ‘flawed by drive to cut costs’

Photo: EPA From the Daily Telegraph:

In a report published today, the National Audit Office (NAO) cast doubt on the Strategic Defence and Security Review and the decisions ministers took about the future of the Armed Forces. A continuing crisis in the defence budget raises the prospects of more major cuts, the watchdog said. It also accused ministers of denying auditors access to Whitehall papers on key defence decisions. Under last year’s review, ministers decided to go ahead with plans to spend £6.2 billion on two new aircraft carriers, even though, according to the NAO, military chiefs would have preferred the money to have been spent on smaller warships. The first carrier was due to enter service in 2020 but, to save money, the second was unlikely to sail and instead would be kept in a state of “extended readiness”. The review also immediately scrapped the Royal Navy’s Harriers, leaving Britain without a working carrier. The NAO criticised the entire defence review process, saying it was dictated by financial concerns because it ran in parallel with the Treasury’s Spending Review, which decided how much money the Ministry of Defence would receive. The auditors said it meant that decisions were made that “had to identify, cost and prioritise alternative capability options in an environment of considerable uncertainty”. “In our view, this is not an ideal situation in which to have to take strategic decisions,” they concluded: Their report also warned that even the single future carrier may yet prove to be unaffordable. The “continuing difficulties the department is facing in balancing its budget leaves carrier strike vulnerable to further changes” as ministers try to manage the MoD’s finances, the auditors said. Adding to those concerns, the report concluded that ministers still did not know how much they would have to pay to enable the new carriers to carry conventional fighters rather than jump jets. The MoD said its decisions would save £3.4 billion, but the NAO warned of major risks that the cost of the carriers could yet rise. The department still had an “incomplete understanding of the costs of the carrier decision”, it said. The NAO also warned that Britain faced “significant military risks” in trying to regenerate the ability to operate a carrier from 2020. Jim Murphy, the shadow defence secretary, said the report confirmed that the defence review was “led by the search for short-term cuts, not our nation’s strategic defence needs”. Margaret Hodge, the Labour chairman of the public accounts committee, said the carriers may fall victim to the “need to balance the books in the short term”. Liam Fox, the Defence Secretary, was “disappointed” in the way the NAO reached its conclusions and said the review was the best response to the “overspent” budget inherited from Labour.

Leave a Reply